Posted 5/13/2024

Persistence Pays Off


For those who have been concerned about KIUCs proposed 386 million dollar expenditure for a West Kauai Energy Project (WKEP), we wanted to share the announcement this past Wednesday that our Department of Land and Natural Resources has withdrawn their previous approval for this project (FOM’s attached comment was filed along with many others, strongly opposed).

You may recall that in March of 2023, KIUC proposed a rate increase and served Kauai island rate payers with a notice of their proposed rate increase that was then filed with the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). KIUC’s notice to the public broke down their proposed rate increase by rate payer categories. When we studied the rate payer categories, we learned that residential rate payers were slated to experience an 18.5-19.5% increase in their monthly bills. However the other rate payer categories were not going to be paying anywhere near as much as the increase proposed for residential rate payers.

FOM members and all Kauai residents would have been significantly impacted if the near 20% increase was approved. At the same time, Earth Justice was considering legal action to undo Board of Land and Natural Resources’ approval/acceptance of KIUC’s Final EA for a large West Kauai Energy Project (WKEP) that involved both a large pump storage hydro-power facility and a separate hydro-power facility that proposed to remove 12 million gallons daily from the Kokee watershed.

The first part of the WKEP involved pump storage hydro-power production. It was to use a set quantity of water to be pumped daily using solar power from a large lower reservoir to a large upper reservoir. At night when solar panels would not make power, the upper reservoir would drain back to the lower, creating power after dark. The concept of this would be that the only water replacement would be that required to replace for water that had evaporated.

The second part of the WKEP, using 12 million gallons daily to operate a separate hydro-power plant, would, if developed, remove 4,380,000,000 gallons of water a year from the watershed.

FOM was concerned that the near 20% rate hike for residential rate payers would be helping KIUC fund the $386 million dollar proposed WKEP. Not only was the 20% increase in our residential rates of great concern, but the proposed extremely costly WKEP was planned despite our KIUC Co-op is already carrying a $250 million dollar debt over and above its assets. This fact was confirmed by review of the KIUC financial statements that are posted online after their annual audits. It just didn’t make sense to have this big a project for a small island with less than 33,000 total electrical accounts that would more than double the debt that our rates would be expected to cover.

After FOM successfully intervened in the KIUC PUC rate increase application, a global settlement was reached this past November between the State Consumer Advocate (a State agency whose mission is to protect utility rate payers from exorbitant/unsupportable rate increases), KIUC and FOM. Through that agreement, KIUC will limit any rate increase to not more than 7.99% for all rate payer categories, residential, resort, commercial, etc. FOM’s legal team felt that was a much better result than the rate increase initially proposed and more fairly distributed.

Now, we are equally happy to report that the Department of Land and Natural Resources has withdrawn their approval of the WKEP. See their notice published May 8, 2024 below, greatly benefiting the environmental integrity of Kokee’s watershed.

For those who have generously supported our environmental work and found the FOM donate link was not working, we recently learned that GoFundMe had changed our URL. Please know that we greatly appreciate all of the support we receive as we strive to preserve our islands environmental health.

Mahalo nui,

Bridget Hammerquist, President
Friends of Maha`ulepu, a 501(c)(3)
Kia`i Wai o Wai`ale`ale, Co-founder
PO Box 1654
Koloa, HI 96756
[email protected]
(808) 742-1037 home
(808) 346-1973 cell

Posted 5/1/2024

Aloha All,

There was a good turnout last Friday at the BLNR meeting on Oahu to consider the disposition of two State land parcels adjacent to the remnant site of the former Coco Palms Hotel. Many testimonies were submitted in writing, by Zoom and in person. They were all but three in favor of the adjacent properties being made part of a historic park and education center verses being used to support the construction of a large resort hotel that intends to use the parcels for parking and for support of the hotel operation.

Two weeks before the hearing, a tropical storm produced floodwaters on the site that Layton Construction said floated one of their trailers and damaged many of their tools. The developers denied any damage then but I doubt they will deny what happened yesterday was of no consequence. As reported in a Kauai County news release today, at least 6,000 gallons of untreated raw sewage spilled onto the Coco Palms demolition site surrounded by dust fencing, a spill caused by a pump failure in the Waste Water Coco Palms Pump Station just mauka of the old hotel buildings. (the spill did not involve the adjacent State lands that I Ola Wailuanui had hoped to use as a site for the public).

The County’s waste water spill notice is not clear as to where this raw untreated sewage was “pumped down”. While they say it did not contaminate State waters, after a recent inspection by the State Department of Health, developers were told that the fish pond, mauka of the damaged hotel, is “waters of the State”. Exactly how did the wastewater spill, due to the mauka station’s pump failure, not contaminate the fish pond as it rolled into the demolition site? Equally unclear is how the Coco Palms spill area was “disinfected”. We can’t imagine anyone wanting to work on that site for a good while. Perhaps the recent flood of waters, captured in the following Hawaii News Now link, and now a large raw sewage spill will prompt the developer to reconsider their plans for a 350 room luxury hotel on this problematic site. This sites potential for detaining storm water and untreated raw sewage, when the mauka pump station fails, does not bode well for the successful operation of a luxury resort (likely to add at least 3,000 flushes a day, guests and employees, to the already ailing Wailua Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities).

NR 05-01-24 (Wastewater Spill Notice: Wailua Coco Palms Sewer Pump Station)

Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

County of Kaua'i, State of Hawaii


News Release

For Immediate Release: May 1, 2024

RISE Logo (transparent background)COUNTY OF KAUA‘I



 (808) 241-4993

Wastewater Spill Notice: Wailua Coco Palms Sewer Pump Station

WAILUA – The public is advised of a wastewater spill of about 6,000 gallons that occurred between 3:30 p.m. and 4 pm., Tuesday, April 30, at the Wailua Coco Palms Sewer Pump Station.

The spill occurred due to the failure of a critical pump controller which caused the pumps to be inoperable.

The contaminated spill area was confined within a fenced off construction yard, adjacent and south of the pump station. The spill did not reach state waters. The ponded material was immediately pumped down and the area was disinfected.

The Wastewater Management Division is working on improvements to the electrical system to prevent incidents in the future.

Anyone with questions may contact Donald Fujimoto with the Wastewater Management Division at 808-241-4083 or via email at [email protected].


Media Contact:

If you are a member of the media with an inquiry for the County of Kaua‘i, its departments or representatives, please email the County of Kaua‘i’s Communications Team at [email protected] to ensure a timely response to your request. Mahalo!

County of Kaua'i, State of Hawaii

Stay Connected with County of Kaua’i, Hawai’i:

  Facebook   RSS   Govdelivery
Manage Subscriptions  |  Help
Hawaii News Now Coco Palms Flooding

Island News News Coverage after BLNR meeting 04/26/2024

BLNR Meeting 04/26/2024 See start of BLNR hearing on Coco Palms at 1 hour 52 minutes

Despite the many known problems associated with this site that has not served as hotel for 32 years, environmental, infrastructure and otherwise, the Land Board voted to release for public auction the largest of the State’s revocable permit parcels. By designating the parcel for public auction,  I Ola Wailuanui has an even greater up hill battle to fulfill their plan to use the site as a place where the public can learn about this original seat of the hawaiian royalty, its cultural, traditional and historic significance for Kauai.

Mahalo nui,

Bridget Hammerquist, President
Friends of Maha`ulepu, a 501(c)(3)
Kia`i Wai o Wai`ale`ale, Co-founder
PO Box 1654
Koloa, HI 96756
[email protected]
(808) 742-1037 home
(808) 346-1973 cell

Posted 4/25/2024


Coco Palms and the developers interest in utilizing the State land acreage (two revocable permit parcels and a large coconut grove that would add 14.5 acres to the resort’s 22+ acres of fee simple land) will be heard by the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) in Honolulu, April 26, 2024. BLNR will also consider an application filed by a non-profit Kauai organization, I Ola Wailuanui, who plan to restore and develop the state lands into a historic public site. The issue before the Board will be whether or not to allow state lands to enhance and support Reef Capital Partner’s RP21 Coco Palms, LLC 350 room resort development. They want the state land to expand the foot print of the new resort hotel they plan to build at the former Coco Palms site.

Friends of Mahaulepu filed strong testimony in support of I Ola Wailuanui’s plan to develop a public site that features and develops the historic properties of these lands, once home to and the seat of the Hawaiian royalty on Kauai. The testimony we filed on behalf of our members to preserve and protect the historic features on the state lands, its environmental health, the Wailua River and the Wailua Beach Park and ocean is below in two separate emails to BLNR. There have been several rather egregious irregularities in the way public officials have dealt with the latest in a string of would be developers, which we invite you to take the time to read as our testimonies below contain facts that all residents should be aware of.

If you want to watch the meeting, click the link below:

Link to watch Board of Land and Natural Resources Coco Palms hearing tomorrow.
Agenda Item D1, likely to be heard after 10:00 am.

If you want to participate and testify, watch the YouTube broadcast and after the Chair announces Agenda Item D1, call 1-253-205-0468 and enter meeting ID #817 0609 2300.

We anticipate that many will testify in favor of the non-profit I Ola Wailuanui. Some of us will be there in person.

The following link includes recent Hawaii News Now coverage on the flooding experienced at the Coco Palms site.

Link to watch Hawaii News Now coverage of flooding at historic Coco Palms

FOM Testimony 1:

Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:16:30 -1000
To: [email protected], [email protected]
From: Bridget Hammerquist <[email protected]>
Subject: Ongoing Violations Coco Palms
Cc: BLNR.Meeting.Notices DLNR.BLNR.Testimony <[email protected]>

Aloha Dawn N. S. Chang,
Director Department of Land and Natural Resources and
Michael Cain, Administrator Office of Conservation and Coastal Lands

When we last appeared before the Land Board there were questions asked of  representatives for RP21 Coco Palms, LLC, the current “would be” developer of a 350 room resort hotel on the site of the former Coco Palms resort, destroyed by hurricane Iniki on September 11, 1992. RP21 representative/owner John Day told the Land Board that the use of state lands was not essential to their “restoration of the historic site”. When asked if the coconut palms were an important historic feature of the site, the developer’s answer was equivocal, claiming to not even realize the site was both a recognized property with features of historic significance, fish pond and numerous burials/iwi kupuna. The property is also included on the National Historic Registry. The developer’s responses December 15, 2023 suggested that the removal of the coconut palm trees was something done in the recent past as Mr Day suggested that the developer now intends to be a good steward and do things right to preserve this significant historic site.

In sharp contrast to that assertion, I invite you to review the inspection report from the Department of Health, released just 5 days after the Land Board last met to consider the Coco Palms development. In its report, you will see numerous photos taken by the DOH site inspection team. There are also development maps offered by RP21 Coco Palms, LLC that identify intended development on state land despite their claim that the state lands were not “essential” to the restoration plans. Of great concern, however, were the developer’s submittals marking numerous coconut palms with a red X to indicate more coconut palms intended for removal as of November 2023. See pages 9-11 in the DOH report. This is well described as well as other violations which I believe you will find of interest since the report was prepared after an unannounced inspection by a sister State Agency. There are also photographs of areas that have been cleared of any trees earlier with pictures of root balls and stumps. DOH photographs also document the heavy ground disturbing equipment on site and the trailers and structures that were not admitted to when responding to Land Board Member question on December 15, 2023. Nearly one acre of vegetation remains on conservation land off Koki Road. It is not obvious that you would otherwise receive the report. Since it contains evidence of multiple environmental violations ongoing at the end of November 2023, during the DOB inspection, which you also addressed in your letter of April 19, 2023, we share the Hawaii Department of Health Clean Water Branch Complaint Inspection Report in the event you have not previously received this report.

Mahalo nui,

Bridget Hammerquist

FOM Testimony 2:

Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:49:51 -1000
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: BLNR.Meeting.Notices DLNR.BLNR.Testimony <[email protected]>, [email protected]
From: Bridget Hammerquist <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item D1 in Strong Support of I Ola Wailuanui

Friends of Maha’ulepu                                      4/24/2024

Aloha Chair Dawn NS Chang and Members of the Board of Land and Natural Resources,

RE: Approve One or More Dispositions to Applicants RP21 Coco Palms LLC and/or I Ola Wailuanui, Inc. and/or Sale of Lease at Public Auction, or No Action for Parcel B, Wailua, Kawaihau, Kauai, TMK: (4) 4-1-003:017. Approve One or More Dispositions to Applicants RP21 Coco Palms LLC and/or I Ola Wailuanui, or No Action for Parcel C, Wailua, Kawaihau, Kauai, TMK: (4) 4-1-005:017.

Please accept this testimony offered on behalf of all the members of Friends of Maha’ulepu which include nearby residents of the historic Coco Palms site as well as more than 1,000 members who reside island wide. We strongly favor public access, use and disposition of the State lands which are on the agenda for consideration by the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) Friday, April 26, 2024.

Agenda item D1 could not have been presented in a more confusing manner. Staff have masterfully offered five potential options/actions by the BLNR for revocable permits on parcels identified as B (TMK: (4) 4-1-003:017) and C (TMK: (4) 4-1-005:017). Not only are these five options confusing but they are once again weighted to benefit RP21 Coco Palms, LLC because when the option gives use to I Ola Wailuanui, the 501c 3, an applicant for these lands, they always provide that I Ola Wailuanui will be subject to an easement right/co-sharing of the parcel with RP21 Coco Palms, LLC. The converse, however, is not true! When the use is to be approved for RP21 Coco Palms, LLC, it is not suggested that I Ola Wailuanui will have an easement right.

We strongly support and recommend that BLNR approve I Ola Wailuanui a one year month to month revocable permit (RP) of parcels B and C, an entity that is not in violation or under investigation for violation of any county, state or federal laws. Affording I Ola Wailuanui a one year month to month revocable permit will allow the BLNR to evaluate the public benefit derived from the proposed historic preservation of this sites ancient past and connection to Hawaiian royalty, a history that spanned hundreds of years. It only really operated as a resort hotel between 1972 and 1992. Even during that time, as one of the descendants children, Ivan Ako, stated in the Declaration, the hotel had a lot of problems with ground water flooding that required sump pump operation 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. (See Declarations filed in support of a Petition to Revoke the County Development permits).

Offered for your consideration and material to the public’s interest is a Kauai County Council Resolution adopted by a majority of Council Members in response to substantial public outcry and objection to any resort development at the former Coco Palms site because of significant infrastructure short comings; traffic, waste water, threats to endangered sea birds and endemic species, sea level rise and threat of county beach park and state land encroachment that will likely adversely impact this historic and revered coastal land and the quality of life for residents of Kauai. When Kauai County Council met, the clear wording of the Kauai County Resolution supports public versus commercial use for the State lands at issue, see May 2023 County Council Resolution here. Under the laws of our State and Hawaii Constitution, State lands are given a preference for public use. Consequently, while development permits are vested with the County for the fee lands, BLNR can and should support public use over commercial use of the nearby state lands. The BLNR is not obligated nor does the law support preferential treatment of a commercial enterprise over the public use and enjoyment of State lands especially those with significant historic roots.

This is especially true when it comes to Agenda Item D1 for Friday which was Agenda Item D6 in December 15, 2023. The developer’s representative, John Day, made it abundantly clear when he responded to questioning by the Land Board that the State lands were not essential or necessary for their development of a resort hotel on the former Coco Palms fee simple lands:

BLNR Meeting December 15, 2023 Agenda Item D6

Chair Chang asks “Are these three. Are these three State parcels are they critical to your development”.

John Day responds “They are not essential and itʻs fair to call it a development Chair, we think of it as a restoration of a property that is on the Hawaii Register of National of Historic Places and so we think of it as a restoration of a historic site but I understand but I understand your meaning when you refer to it as development. Yes we will restore the historic Coco Palms regardless of what happens with these three parcels, they are not essential to restoring the historic Coco Palms. You know that being said, they are valuable um to the public in terms of providing parking um to the public and access to the public which we will provide. But they are not essential to restoring the historic Coco Palms”

Chair Chang “My followup question. Have you represented to the County in your development plans that these parcels these three revocable these three parcels are part of your project?”

John Day “Well I mean, they are part of our site plan. Our hope is to be able to use these parcels as part of the restoration of the historic Coco Palms. They are not essential to the project. The project will move forward either way”.

Chair Chang “So since they have been on your site plans, if you do not get these three RPs does that jeopardize your approvals before the County?”

John Day “Iʻm not aware that it would”.

Chair Chang “One final question. You mentioned the historic, you were here to restore the historic Coco Palms. Itʻs not a development. The Coconut trees that were cut down, you understood that those were part of the historic property”.

Mauna Kea Trask interrupts “Chairman”

Chair Chang “Iʻm going to ask Mr Day. If he cannot answer the question Mauna Kea, thatʻs okay. Thatʻs okay but Iʻm going to ask Mr Day. Are you? Cause you are the principal now. You represented to us that you are going to steward these lands and that you, you are here, you are present and I appreciate that you are present. So I am going to ask you the question. Did you understand that the coconut trees that were cut down were part of the historic property and the historic character and nature of the property?”

John Day “Well thatʻs a, thatʻs a long conversation. Um”.

Chair Chang “Just yes or no?”

John Day “At the time the trees were cut down no one on or team, and I mean we had archeological monitors, right, people who had worked at SHPD for a couple of decades. You know. People who were very experienced and No one was aware the previous owner had put the property on the Hawaii register of historic places. So they were unaware. Cause remember we foreclosed in 2022. Thatʻs when we took over. The previous owner that we foreclosed on put the property on the historic register. With respect to those trees, we were unaware that it was on the Hawaii historic register.”

Ends 01:26:00
BLNR December 15, 2023

Absent BLNR approval of RPs for parcels B and C for I Ola Wailuanui, we strongly support and recommend no action by BLNR at this time because of the following irregularities that have casts a negative and biased pall on this process.

Historic Background

Coco Palms Ventures, LLC, a Delaware Corporation that purchased the fee simple lands of the former Coco Palms Resort in 2006 from PRII (Prudential) was the last entity named on the State lease for the coconut grove and the three State RP parcels under consideration. In December 2023, Coco Palms Ventures, LLC interest in the RP parcels A, B and C, were terminated by BLNR Action. The lease between the State and Coco Palms Ventures, LLC was assigned by Coco Palm Ventures, LLC to PRII who then assigned the lease to Coco Palms Hui, LLC. While BLNR approved the assignment, there was never a transfer of the lease and the RPs were never put in the name of Coco Palms Hui, LLC. As Mr Tsuji explained when BLNR met April 14, 2023 Coco Palms Hui, LLC, never produced/provided the tax clearance and other documents necessary to perfect the prior Board approval. The coconut grove lease is still in the name of Coco Palms Ventures, LLC, an entity whose Hawaii State registered status was terminated December 4, 2017. None of the existing Coco Palms entities have any relationship with Coco Palms Ventures, LLC. When Coco Palms Ventures, LLC (Ventures) experienced financial hardship and were unable to satisfy the terms of Prudential’s sale of Coco Palms to them, they returned a deed to Prudential in lieu of foreclosure. Thus, the prior BLNR approval of an assignment from Ventures back to Prudential who then was assigning their interest to Coco Palms Hui, LLC was never perfected: Russell Tsuji at 53:40 BLNR April 14, 2023

Not only did Coco Palms Hui, LLC fail to pay property taxes on the RP lands from 2017 to 2023, but as Alison Neustein reported April 14, 2023, she was sending out a Notice of Deficiency for failure to pay property taxes during the same interval on the State leased coconut grove land. See Alison Neustein’s comments at 58:00 in the above link.

This is where the irregularities began. Ms Neustein did not send the Notice of Deficiency to attorneys for Coco Palms Hui, LLC and I Ola Wailuanui, rather she directed the Notice of Deficiency to Mauna Kea Trask depriving I Ola Wailuanui a fair and equal opportunity to satisfy the deficiency. Rather, staff indirectly selected the applicant who would be allowed to cure the deficiency and ensure the State land parcels while ignoring I Ola Wailuanui’s application that had been filed at the same time in February 2023.

Reef Capital through its loan servicing entity Private Capital Group (PCG) initiated foreclosure proceedings against Coco Palms Hui, LLC and its operators Chad Waters and Tyler Green who had also signed a personal guarantee for the loan brokered to them by PCG representing 6 or 7 Reef Capital investors. When the foreclosure proceeding was conducted, it was conducted by PCG, an agent for the lender.

Coco Palms Hui, LLC challenged the foreclosure in the Appellate Court along with their loan broker Paul Honkavaaro. That challenge has been on appeal since 2022. RP21 received a commissioner’s deed to the fee parcels in the course of the foreclosure proceeding, leaving Chad Waters, Tyler Green and Coco Palms Hui, LLC with a foreclosure appeal as their only asset.

In March of this year, the Reef Capital Lenders agreed to release Chad Waters and Tyler Green from their personal guarantee of the loan to buy the fee property from Prudential. In return, Chad Waters and Tyler Green agreed to dismiss their appeal and the only entity still contesting the foreclosure against Coco Palms Hui, LLC is Mr Honkavaaro.

In the meantime, Coco Palms Hui, LLC has no assets and owns nothing in fee.

Friends of Maha’ulepu filed a Petition to Revoke the Coco Palms permits for violations of many of the County permit conditions. In April 14, 2023 BLNR meeting, Ms Neustein Exhibit E, which shows that all the building permits have expired, most as of June 27, 2023. The Planning Director’s report, admits that many of the development conditions have not been met but it was his recommendation that the Planning Commission not revoke the development permits.

The second major irregularity in this matter occurred at the Planning Commission hearing March 12, 2024 when Mauna Kea Trask produced a lease that he suggested to the Planning Commission was about to be signed by this Board.

See the AG “Approved as to form” lease which Ms Neustein was instrumental in obtaining and delivering to Mr Trask. This document was produced less than a month before our Petition to Revoke hearing. Ms Neustein was not identified on the agenda as someone the Commission would be addressing. She appeared at 4:00 pm after an all day proceeding before the Kauai County Planning Commission and went into an Executive Session without prior notice to the public. Friends of Maha’ulepu objected to her entry into the Executive Session and we were told that she was there to help the Planning Commission understand the workings of the BLNR. When the public was brought back into the hearing, it was clear the Executive Session discussion was about the lease and Commissioner Ako actually asked Ms Neustein on the record if it was possible that BLNR would not sign the lease that she and Mr Trask were representing as an “all but done deal”. She responded that she couldn’t imagine that happening as she hadn’t seen that before. The exchange between Planning Commission Ako and Ms Neustein occurred during the last hour. March 12, 2024 Planning Commission Hearing on Petition to Revoke Coco Palms development permits.

One big problem, the lease presented to the Kauai County Planning Commission is in the name of Coco Palms Hui, LLC, an entity that owns none of the fee lands. Consequently, their status is similar to that of I Ola Wailuanui, in that they are also not an owner in fee property adjacent to the State RPs or coconut grove. Unlike I Ola Wailuanui, they do not have a public interest in restoration of the property for its public and historic benefit. The former Coco Palms Hui, LLC, a bankrupt entity with no ownership interest in the lands adjacent to the State lands, would not likely be an entity to be awarded the State coconut grove lease. However, when Mr Trask and Ms Neustein presented the Unsigned Unapproved Alleged AG Lease to Coco Palms Hui LLC dated 02/13/2024, it sure muddied the waters on our Petition to Revoke Hearing. At the end of the hearing, the Planning Commission found that Friends of Maha’ulepu had no standing to bring the Petition to Revoke. We have since filed an Appeal of their Decision on our Standing and have also appealed the irregularity associated with Ms Neustein’s entry into the Executive Session. Please see the objection we filed to that irregularity which was filed prior to our Notice of Appeal.

Mahalo nui,

Bridget Hammerquist, President
Friends of Maha`ulepu, a 501(c)(3)
Kia`i Wai o Wai`ale`ale, Co-founder
PO Box 1654
Koloa, HI 96756
[email protected]
(808) 742-1037 home
(808) 346-1973 cell

Posted 3/25/2024


In our last email, we shared that Judge Valenciano would be hearing a procedural motion last Thursday March 21, 2024. Basically, the County was complaining that they needed more time to oppose our motion for Preliminary Injunction. We filed a motion because the County has refused to require Gary Pinkston to comply with the grading ordinances 22-7.9 and 22-7.13. When Meridian Pacific and Pinkston received their grading permit March 23, 2022, the permit itself, on page 2, informs the permit holder that absent a request for extension, the permit will expire one year from the date of issue. Ordinance 22-7.13 states that all grubbing and grading permits shall expire one year from date of issue. Expired permits are addressed under 22-7.9(d) and applicant is told that they can apply for a renewal of an expired permit.Another problem, in this case, is that when a subdivision is planned as with Meridian Pacific development on Kiahuna Plantation Drive, the developer is required to obtain tentative subdivision approval from the County before they can even get the permit. Pinkston and Meridian Pacific did get tentative subdivision approval 8/10/2021, over our objection due to endangered species, caves and burials that were likely to be adversely impacted. That permit was only good for a year, however absent a request for extension which Meridian Pacific and Pinkston failed to do. On September 12, 2023, the Planning Director told the Planning Commission that their tentative subdivision approval was void as a matter of law.In excellent briefs filed by our attorneys (links below) supporting the request for injunction, a prolonged stop to any work at the Kiahuna Drive development site, we document that Pinkston’s subdivision approvals are still void and no new application has been filed with the County. He has been using explosives, doing mass grading, and pouring concrete without the proper permits, ignoring burial mounds and at least 5 endangered species that have been seen on his 28 acre parcel.When we appeared before Judge Valenciano last Thursday, he declined to give the County any more time and he told us to be ready this Thursday as he intended to rule on this motion. The Judge said the questions was pretty simple: “Do they have a valid permit or not?”.

Even though the developer has never denied what they are developing is a subdivided property, the County tried to muddy the waters by saying it was just a grading permit not tied to a subdivision. That was the County Attorney’s attempt to get around the fact that the tentative subdivision approval was now void and the approval is required to obtain a valid grading permit and the date must be noted on the grading plans. That argument is not going to work. The Judge is going to have some fun. Even if it were a mass grading permit, unrelated to a subdivision development (which this is not), ordinance 22-7.13 states that all grading permits shall expire one year from the date of issue if the party does not make a request for extension much like the tentative subdivision approval ordinance. The grading ordinance also states that a grading permit shall be void one year from the date of issue.

While the developer can request an extension or “upon application” seek renewal of an expired permit, they do need to go through the steps of doing so by filing the required application, providing all the information requested in 22-7.9.

What did Pinkston and Meridian Pacific do in this case? Nothing for six months. Then they walked into the County on 9/7/2023 with a check for $15,200 six months after their grading permit had expired March 23, 2023. They are now attempting to characterize the September check as a payment for extending their permit for March 23, 2023 to March 23, 2024. Look at the crossed through dates on the payment receipt that follows. We know they did nothing for six months because the engineering staff person originally thought their permit ran from 9/7/2023 to 9/6/2024 and he made a note to that effect on the receipt. That wasn’t the case. They let their March 23, 2022 permit expire in March 2023. It’s void and even though we asked for every document Public Works has regarding the grading permit for the Kiahuna Plantation Drive development, Public Works has not been able to produce any new application or mass grading plan as required by ordinance section 22-7.9.

The public is welcome to attend this coming Thursday at 1:00 pm. It should be an interesting hearing. If you can attend we will see you there at District Court of the Fifth Circuit, 3970 Kaana Street, Suite 210, Lihue, HI 96766-1282.

Reply Brief in Response to County Public Works Opposition to FOMs Request for Injunction

Reply Brief in Response to the Developer Opposition to FOMs Request for Injunction

Mahalo nui,

Bridget Hammerquist, President
Friends of Maha`ulepu, a 501(c)(3)
Kia`i Wai o Wai`ale`ale, Co-founder
PO Box 1654
Koloa, HI 96756
[email protected]
(808) 742-1037 home
(808) 346-1973 cell




——– Forwarded Message ——–

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:29:53 -1000
To: Michael Moule <[email protected]>
From: Bridget Hammerquist <[email protected]>
Subject: Request for Contested Case

Aloha Michael,

Please accept this email on behalf of the members of Friends of Maha`ulepu and the membership of Save Koloa which number more than 1,000 individuals keenly interested in the preservation of a clean and healthful environment of the south shore of Kauai. These Declarations (Silva, Kaohelaulii, Okinaka and Hammerquist) detail and confirm the traditional and cultural practices and interests affected by the development of TMK 4-2-8-14-32. Based on the interests of our members and constitutional rights to a clean and healthful environment which is being abridged with the development of a portion, Lot 1 of this TMK, we request a Contested Case Hearing before any grading or grubbing permit is reissued for the subject property.On March 22, 2022, Bryan Wienand, Public Works Civil Engineer V issued the grading permit, and the developer was charged a permit fee of $1,520,000. According to the permit, the developer paid 1% and covered a bond that insured the payment of his grading permit fee obligation. Under the provisions of the County’s Grading Ordinance, the grading permit expired and was void as of March 23, 2023. The public has continued to complain about the illegal grading of this site. Their complaints have been made to the Planning Commission and you have been in attendance at Planning Commission meetings where abundant public testimony was offered objecting to the use of explosives, disturbance of subsurface artesian springs and the habitat otherwise suitable for the blind cave spider and the blind amphipod who were identified and mapped on a property immediately adjacent with similar features: soil depth of less than 12 inches, primarily rocky soil, confirmed by Geolabs to have likely voids and mesocaverns (per their report filed with your office 2021) with at least 5 endangered species of endemic birds (Pueo, Koloa Duck, Nene as well multiple sea birds) on the subject parcel per US Fish and Wildlife Services. There are also burial mounds that were identified on the parcel by Cultural Surveys Hawaii with at least one of the Declarations (Silva, Kaohelaulii, Okinaka and Hammerquist) attesting to their relative buried on the site.
County Ordinance Section 22-7.13 Expiration of Permits specifically states that a grading permit “shall expire and become void one (1) year after the date of issuance”.

“(a) Every grading or grubbing permit shall expire and become void one (1) year after the date of issuance.

(b) Every grading or grubbing permit shall expire and become void unless the work permitted therein is started within six (6) months after the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of ninety (90) days. Before the work can be recommenced, a new permit shall first be obtained to do so and the fee therefor shall be the fee as specified in Section 22-7.12. Permit fees for an expired permit shall not be refunded, even if no work has commenced.”

The expiration ordinance clearly states that if the one year is allowed to lapse without an extension, the permit is void and a new application must be filed with the payment of a new fee. The ordinance further provides that there will be no refund on the fee, if the permit lapses before the work is completed.
In July 2023, the Planning Department referred a similar lapse in the tentative subdivision approval granted August 10, 2021 that lapsed August 10, 2022 without an application for an extension. On September 12, 2023, the Planning Commission received the County Attorney’s Opinion that the tentative subdivision approval for this parcel had lapsed one year from the date of its issue because there was no application for extension prior to that permit becoming void. The same finding was made for this same developers Kukuiula tentative subdivision approval which expired one year from its date of issue in early 2022. Thereafter, Meridian Pacific and Gary Pinkston applied for a new tentative subdivision approval for the Kukuiula development. No renewal has been made for the Kiahuna subdivision at 5425 Pau A Laka Street and Kiahuna Plantation Drive. It is our position that no grading permit exists and none can be issued without a new application as specifically required in Section 22-7.13b. Once a new application is filed, the public works engineer can issue a new permit, renewing their grading permit for one year from the date of re-issuance.
We recently received the County Attorney’s Opposition to our Motion for Preliminary Injunction. In that Motion, they included a “Renewal” of the grading permit supposedly approved in September 2023, the same month as the County Attorney’s Opinion on the meaning of “Void” in the tentative subdivision approval permit ordinance. That September renewal is illegal because the applicant’s permit lapsed one year from the March 23, 2022 date of issue without any application for an extension of that permit period. Once  void, the applicant has to comply with subsection B and file a new permit application, paying the associated fees, before they can seek renewal under subsection D. Gary Pinkston/Meridian Pacific and each of the owner/applicants are legally required, either directly or through an agent, to reapply for the grading permit and pay a new fee for same, which is called for when the applicant allows the one year period from issuance to expire. If and when Public Works does receive an application for the issuance of a new/renewed grading permit for TMK 4-2-8-14-32 (Lot 1, 23.78 acres, a subdivision of the full  lot), please accept this email as our request for a Contested Case before any legal permit is issued by Public Works.Pertinent Provisions from the March 23, 2022 grading permit: